AI and Robotics Cooperatives: Empowering Shared Ownership in Tech

Artificial intelligence (AI) and robotics are transforming industries, but their rapid advancement has raised concerns about centralized control and unequal benefits. In response, a growing movement of AI and robotics cooperatives is emerging to democratize technology development. These cooperatives are organizations owned and governed by their members – whether workers, users, or communities – and they aim to ensure that the benefits of AI and robotics are distributed more equitably. By following cooperative principles like democratic decision-making and shared ownership, they offer an alternative model in the tech sector. Below, we explore several notable cooperatives and collaborative initiatives in AI and robotics, examining their missions, structures, and impacts on the landscape.

Driver’s Seat Cooperative

• Mission: Driver’s Seat Cooperative is a driver-owned data platform that empowers gig workers (rideshare and delivery drivers) to take control of their data and earnings. Founded in 2019, its mission is to give drivers actionable insights into when, where, and how to drive for maximum income, by aggregating and analyzing the data that gig companies typically keep for themselves. By using Driver’s Seat’s mobile app, drivers can see their true hourly wages after expenses and identify the most profitable driving strategies. The cooperative also aims to leverage this collective data for broader worker advocacy and smarter urban planning.
• Structure: Driver’s Seat is structured as a cooperative owned by the drivers themselves. It incorporated as a limited cooperative association (LCA), legally requiring that at least 51% of profits go back to driver members. Each user of the app can choose to become a member-owner and gets one vote in governance, ensuring democratic control by drivers. The coop’s CEO, Hays Witt, has emphasized finding investors aligned with this model – prioritizing drivers’ ownership and long-term sustainability over quick returns. This structure enables Driver’s Seat to seek funding (from impact investors and foundation grants) while legally binding the company to serve drivers’ interests, with an elected board drawn from driver-members.
• Impact: Since its launch, Driver’s Seat has shown how shared data can improve gig workers’ livelihoods and influence policy. Over 5 million trips have been logged through the app, and participating drivers saw an average 13% increase in income by using the data insights to plan their work. The cooperative has expanded to over 30 U.S. cities, doubling its user base from 2,000 to 5,000 between late 2021 and 2022. By aggregating anonymized driver data, Driver’s Seat also sells valuable insights to city and state agencies for transportation planning – such as identifying congestion patterns, optimal rideshare pickup zones, or gaps in driver rest areas. Earnings from these contracts are returned to driver-members as dividends. This model has attracted support from philanthropic and civic tech organizations (e.g. Mozilla, Rockefeller Foundation) as a way to make gig economy data a public good. In sum, Driver’s Seat Cooperative is shifting power to drivers: helping individual gig workers optimize their pay, while collectively giving them a voice in data-driven decisions that affect their work and cities.

Radiant Collective

• Mission: Radiant Collective is a community-based cooperative focused on reimagining education through collaboration and creativity, rather than a high-tech AI initiative. Founded by educators Jo and Tim Lawson, it began as an Agile Learning Center for homeschoolers and evolved into a cooperative learning community in Florida. The core mission is to empower young learners and their families by providing a flexible, student-led learning environment. Radiant Collective emphasizes project-based learning, arts, and real-world problem solving in a supportive co-op setting. According to its founders, the goal is to foster “collaboration, problem solving, and critical thinking” in children while nurturing their creativity. Radiant’s vision is rooted in the belief that if students take charge of their education in a collaborative community, they will grow into compassionate and engaged citizens.
• Structure: Radiant Collective operates as a homeschool cooperative with a nonprofit foundation arm. Families participate as members of the co-op, collectively shaping programming and governance. The Radiant Learning Collective (the co-op school for ages 5–15) is supported by the Radiant Collective Foundation, a registered nonprofit that raises funds and coordinates community initiatives. Decisions about curriculum, schedules, and events are made democratically by the educators and member families, embodying the cooperative principle of stakeholder involvement. The foundation’s board (which includes parents and community supporters) oversees resources and ensures alignment with Radiant’s educational mission. This dual structure allows Radiant to be both grassroots-driven (through the co-op) and sustainable via charitable fundraising.
• Impact: Radiant Collective’s impact is primarily in the educational and social realm. It has provided an alternative learning model for families disillusioned with conventional schools, especially in the wake of COVID-19 disruptions. By 2024, Radiant’s learning center hosted families multiple days a week with a mix of structured lessons, tutoring, and “open studio” creative time. Parents report that their children thrive with greater independence and motivation, developing skills in self-direction and teamwork. Radiant also builds community: it regularly convenes showcases where students present projects, and it plans to offer after-school sessions open to public school students to bridge connections between homeschool and traditional school communities. While not an AI or robotics cooperative, Radiant Collective illustrates how cooperative values can drive innovation in allied fields like education. Its success in engaging parents and kids as co-creators of learning provides a model of grassroots cooperation that larger AI and robotics initiatives can draw inspiration from – emphasizing human-centered development, inclusion, and shared purpose.

Salus Coop

• Mission: Salus Coop is a pioneering data cooperative for health data, founded in Spain as one of Europe’s first citizen-driven health data coops. Its mission is to give individuals control over their personal health records and enable privacy-preserving data sharing for public good. In practice, Salus provides a platform where people can safely store their medical and wellness data and decide if they want to share it with researchers. The goal is to accelerate medical research and innovation by pooling health data, but on patients’ own terms. “Our future health depends largely on combining and integrating data,” Salus’s founders assert, “but in a way that citizens remain in the driver’s seat”. By legitimizing citizens’ rights over their health information, Salus Coop aims to demonstrate a new social contract for health data – one based on consent, transparency, and collective benefit.
• Structure: Salus Coop is organized as a cooperative association of individuals (patients and citizens) in Spain (initially in Catalonia). Members who join the cooperative can upload their health data to a secure digital repository. Through a democratic governance process (e.g. general assemblies), members collectively decide on rules for data access and approve research projects requesting to use their anonymized data. The coop partners with hospitals, universities, and public agencies, but importantly, ownership of the data stays with the individuals. Salus’s platform is built on open-source infrastructure from partners like ETH Zurich, and it encourages the formation of local or national sister cooperatives that federate under similar principles. The cooperative is led by a small professional team and advisors in health research, reporting to the member base. By design, Salus Coop operates not for profit, but to maximize social impact and trust in data sharing.
• Impact: Salus Coop has proof-of-concept projects demonstrating citizen-powered health research. Early on, it contributed to studies on genomics and rare diseases by recruiting members to share specific health data sets with scientists under clear consent parameters. It has hosted workshops and “data donation” drives to educate the public on data rights. Salus also became an influential voice in Europe’s policy discussions about data governance. It has advocated for the European Health Data Space to include cooperative models that reward citizens for sharing data safely. While still relatively small, Salus Coop represents a significant cultural shift in healthcare R&D: it shows that patients are willing to share data altruistically when they are respected as equal partners. This cooperative has inspired similar efforts elsewhere (for example, the Swiss MIDATA cooperative operates on a comparable premise). By 2023, Salus Coop had proven that participatory data governance can work in practice, giving researchers access to valuable datasets (like patient-recorded outcomes, fitness tracker logs, etc.) that would otherwise remain siloed or inaccessible, all while building public trust. In the long run, such health data coops could accelerate cures and personalized medicine by assembling rich datasets that no single hospital or company could on its own.

Data Union Foundation

• Mission: The Data Union Foundation (often shortened to DataUnion) is an initiative to facilitate “data unions” – groups of people collaboratively collecting and monetizing data for AI. Its mission is to disrupt the Big Tech data monopoly by enabling individuals and communities to earn value from the data they generate. DataUnion believes that if people can pool their data (from social media, sensors, etc.) and share in the profit of its use in AI, a much more inclusive and ethical data economy can emerge. In short, it aims to build a “new data ecosystem” where all participants benefit, stating: “DataUnions are a powerful way for communities to collaborate in a particular field. They offer brand new opportunities to mobilize and reward groups to produce AI-ready data sets. All participants benefit from the value creation.”. Beyond just advocating, the Foundation provides the technology and support needed to launch these data unions across domains.
• Structure: DataUnion Foundation itself is set up as a platform and emerging DAO (Decentralized Autonomous Organization). Founded by Robin Lehmann and Mark Siebert around 2021–22, it started as a self-funded open-source project and later raised seed funding to grow its platform. The Foundation is building “DataUnions-as-a-Service” infrastructure – essentially software tools, smart contracts, and community frameworks that others can use to start their own data union. For governance, DataUnion is launching a crypto token (the UNION token) and a DataUnion DAO, allowing stakeholders (data contributors, project partners, etc.) to vote on protocol upgrades and ecosystem grants. Each individual data union that uses the platform can have its own rules and revenue-sharing model, but the Foundation provides guidelines (e.g. open data licensing, fair reward distribution) and technical backbone (for secure data handling and payments). In essence, DataUnion Foundation acts as a cooperative-of-cooperatives in the data space – uniting various community data projects under a shared infrastructure and token economy.
• Impact: Though still young, DataUnion has spearheaded several pilot projects proving the data union concept. One early project was Planet Computer Vision (PCV), where over 600 global contributors uploaded and labeled images of trash in natural environments to train an AI to recognize litter. The crowd effort successfully created a dataset that taught a small robot to pick up garbage on a beach, showcasing how anyone, anywhere can contribute to AI for good. Another example is WeDataNation, a data union that lets individuals pool social media and e-commerce data in exchange for compensation when that aggregate data is used for market research. Similarly, Brainstem Health is using the platform for crowdsourced health sensor data, and nCight is turning surgical camera footage into a data union for medical AI models. These projects have attracted partnerships – for instance, DataUnion teamed up with the Sovereign Nature Initiative for an environmental data union and with Bitgrit (a decentralized AI marketplace) to extend its reach. By 2023, the Foundation secured about $1.5M in funding and launched its beta platform. The concept of data unions has also gained recognition in web3 and data ethics circles as a promising way to grant people “data dividends”. If DataUnion’s model scales, it could create a future where communities – from neighborhoods to niche interest groups – collectively own valuable datasets (for training AI) and negotiate their use, rather than passively yielding data to tech giants. This would mean a more diverse and equitable AI landscape, with better privacy and shared economic benefits.

AI Commons

• Mission: AI Commons is a global nonprofit initiative with the ambitious mission of making AI a public good that anyone, anywhere can benefit from. Founded around 2019 by AI leaders and social innovators (including Yoshua Bengio and others), AI Commons envisions a world where artificial intelligence is developed and applied collaboratively for the common good. Its mission statement emphasizes “allowing anyone, anywhere, to benefit from AI for the common good”. In practical terms, AI Commons seeks to democratize access to AI technology, data, and knowledge – especially for communities and problem-solvers working on societal challenges. Rather than an engineering organization building specific tools, it serves as a facilitator and convener: connecting diverse stakeholders (researchers, NGOs, governments, grassroots communities) and launching collaborative projects aligned with ethical and inclusive AI.
• Structure: AI Commons operates as an open collective with partnerships across sectors. It is not a member-owned cooperative in the traditional sense, but it embodies cooperative values through multi-stakeholder governance. The initiative is supported by various organizations (e.g., The Future Society, Mila, UNESCO) and has working groups that anyone can join. Key programs of AI Commons are structured to encourage local ownership and iteration. For example, the Local Problem Scoping program brings together community members and AI experts in workshops to identify pressing local issues and prototype AI solutions. AI Commons provides a framework and resources for these collaborations, but the communities define their needs and co-create the solutions – reflecting a bottom-up approach. Another program, AI Community Hubs, supports regional “living labs” where people can experiment with AI for community benefit, sharing their results openly. Overall, AI Commons is governed by a steering committee drawn from its network, and it leverages existing guidelines (like the UN’s AI for Good principles) to ensure its efforts align with ethical standards. It’s essentially a coalition-of-the-willing with loose structure, united by a common manifesto that AI should be inclusive and globally accessible.
• Impact: Despite a modest budget, AI Commons has catalyzed several impactful projects since its inception. In 2020, it organized a Health and Well-being Hackathon in Nigeria that convened 100 participants – including local problem owners (such as patients and health workers) – to ideate AI solutions for community health challenges. This led to prototypes for improving maternal healthcare using simple AI tools, and the methodology of community co-design was documented for reuse. AI Commons also launched the Global Data Pledge in partnership with the UN’s ITU, creating a mechanism for organizations to voluntarily share critical datasets during emergencies (such as pandemics or natural disasters). This proved valuable during the COVID-19 crisis, as several companies and research labs pledged data which was used to build public dashboards and models. In 2021, AI Commons contributed to blueprints for “AI for Cities”, collaborating with the World Economic Forum and city governments to develop responsible AI use cases for urban services. Perhaps equally important is AI Commons’ role in thought leadership: it has hosted workshops (like a foundational assembly in Montréal) to advance the idea of an “AI commons,” and inspired similar efforts (for instance, regional “AI Commons” groups in Latin America). By promoting open collaboration and sharing in AI development, AI Commons has laid groundwork for treating certain AI solutions – e.g. for climate change, healthcare, education – as collective assets rather than proprietary products. Its impact is thus measured not just in projects launched, but in the growing community of practitioners who see AI through the lens of cooperation and commons.

READ-COOP (Transkribus)

• Mission: READ-COOP is an exemplar of a successful AI cooperative in the research and cultural heritage domain. Founded in 2019, READ-COOP SE (which stands for Recognition and Enrichment of Archival Documents – Cooperative Society) was created to sustain and govern Transkribus, an AI platform for handwritten text recognition. The mission of READ-COOP is to democratize access to cutting-edge AI for archives, libraries, and the general public by operating on cooperative principles. In essence, it provides a powerful machine learning service (transcribing historical manuscripts) as a community-owned resource. Its vision statement emphasizes aligning technology with public interest: rather than monetize user data or prioritize profit, it aims to “function as public infrastructure” for digital history and cultural preservation. By uniting archives, universities, and citizen historians under one member-owned platform, READ-COOP seeks to continually improve the AI through collective contributions and ensure the tool serves its diverse users’ needs.
• Structure: READ-COOP is structured as a European Cooperative Society (SCE), a legal form that allows cross-border cooperative membership within the EU. Its members (currently over 200 organizations across more than 30 countries) include national archives, libraries, universities, local historical societies, and even individual researchers. Each member buys a share and gets voting rights in the General Meeting, following the one-member-one-vote principle. The coop is managed by a board elected from the member institutions and a managing director. What makes READ-COOP unique is how it intertwines cooperative governance with technical development: it has a Technical Committee and user working groups that any member can join to influence the software’s roadmap (e.g. requesting new features or languages for Transkribus). Members also contribute data and AI training; for instance, an archive can upload images of old manuscripts and transcribe a portion of them, which helps train Transkribus’s machine learning models to read that script. As members improve the AI with their data, they collectively benefit from higher accuracy for all. The cooperative sustains itself through membership fees and service fees (non-members can also pay to use Transkribus, but at higher rates, incentivizing institutions to join the coop). Notably, READ-COOP’s charter mandates ethical and open usage: all AI processing runs on 100% renewable energy, and user-contributed data isn’t exploited commercially. This structure has allowed READ-COOP to turn a grant-funded project into a self-sustaining, community-driven AI service.
• Impact: READ-COOP’s impact has been remarkable in both technological and social terms. Transkribus, under the coop’s stewardship, has become a leading platform for archival document transcription – it has processed over 90 million historical document images to date. The AI models (trained on diverse scripts and languages by the community) now enable scholars and even hobbyists to decipher manuscripts that were previously inaccessible, from medieval letters to 19th-century newspapers. This has unlocked countless texts for research, education, and genealogy. Importantly, READ-COOP’s governance means users have a direct say: for example, the coop voted to keep the base transcription service free for casual users, and to implement features like an interface for community volunteers to correct AI errors (crowd-corrected data further improves the models). Through cooperative ownership, cultural institutions that might have been priced out of advanced AI now share ownership of one. Many small archives and museums across Europe have joined, pooling resources to maintain this critical tool. READ-COOP also actively promotes digital literacy – it runs training workshops on using AI for archives, and supports citizen science projects (like transcribing letters from World War I by local history groups). This wide engagement hints at a larger impact: READ-COOP has shown that even in a high-tech field like AI, a cooperative can compete and thrive. By 2025 it proved a viable alternative to commercial software, aligning an AI platform with public values of transparency, privacy, and broad access. The success of READ-COOP serves as a model for other AI domains, suggesting that cooperatives could manage infrastructure for things like language translation, data archives, or AI-driven public services in a similarly inclusive way.

The Principle of Cooperation (TPOCo)

• Mission: The Principle of Cooperation, abbreviated TPOCo, is not a cooperative organization but rather an innovative framework guiding how AI and other systems could be designed around cooperation. Developed by interdisciplinary researcher Heinz Peter Lichtenberg, TPOCo’s mission is to establish a universal scientific understanding of cooperation that can inform everything from biology to economics to AI ethics. In the context of AI and robotics, TPOCo advocates that artificial agents and technologies should be conceived as part of our human cooperative collective, rather than as independent or adversarial entities. The core idea is that cooperation is a fundamental principle of nature – defined as “the coordinated acquisition, transformation, and sharing of energy by a group working together to sustain itself and thrive” – and if we align AI with this principle, we can ensure AI works with humans for collective progress, not against us. In essence, TPOCo’s vision is to imbue AI development with a cooperative ethos at a deep level.
• Concept and Structure: As a framework, TPOCo is articulated in academic preprints and on a community website (co-operatio.org) that serves as a hub for discussion. It’s not a member-owned cooperative, but it fosters a collaborative community of researchers and practitioners interested in cooperative AI. TPOCo’s theory draws on scientific insights across scales – from how cells cooperate in an organism, to how human societies function – and identifies common patterns and “elements” of cooperation (like energy sharing, team formation, etc.). By formalizing these, it aims to provide a **blueprint for building systems that are resilient, fair, and aligned with collective well-being】. In practical terms, proponents of TPOCo have applied it to questions like AI ethics: for example, how an AI content moderation system might balance free speech and hate speech through cooperative feedback loops rather than top-down control. The TPOCo community shares resources openly – one notable aspect is that Lichtenberg published the core paper as an open preprint to invite interdisciplinary input. There are also ongoing efforts to engage the public (with explanatory articles, visuals, and even a draft Wikipedia entry being developed). In summary, TPOCo’s “structure” is that of an open knowledge collaboration around a principle, aiming to influence designers and policymakers.
• Impact: While still emerging, TPOCo has started to influence the conversation around cooperative AI. The framework contributed to discussions at events like the AI and Human Cooperation workshop (where scenarios of AI as a cooperative partner were explored). It provides a vocabulary and conceptual toolset for researchers interested in moving beyond just “alignment” of AI with individual goals to aligning AI with societal or collective goals. For example, the idea of AI being treated as an “individual” in the human collective with mutual interdependence – one of TPOCo’s proposals – has been echoed in AI ethics circles focusing on human-AI collaboration. If TPOCo gains traction, its impact could be seen in future AI guidelines or design principles that explicitly prioritize cooperation (much like some AI principles today emphasize transparency or privacy). Already, its influence is visible in interdisciplinary work: a 2023 paper in AI and Society cited TPOCo when arguing for “cooperative intelligence” as a metric for AI systems. Moreover, TPOCo underpins some experimental projects – e.g., simulations of AI agents that follow energy-sharing rules to see if they achieve better group outcomes. This research could inform how robots might cooperate on tasks or how autonomous systems could negotiate resources without human intervention. In short, TPOCo’s impact is prospective and philosophical: it’s infusing cooperative thinking into AI development narratives. By articulating cooperation as a foundational principle, it challenges developers to build AI that enhances our collective “thriving” rather than just performing tasks in isolation. Over time, this could help ensure AI and robotics are integrated into society in ways that strengthen community, solidarity, and shared prosperity.

URCA (Universal Robot Consortium Advocates)

• Mission: URCA, short for Universal Robot Consortium Advocates, represents a call to bring cooperative principles into the field of robotics on a global scale. URCA’s vision is a consortium of robotics stakeholders advocating for open collaboration and shared standards in robotics development. The mission behind URCA is to ensure that as robotics becomes ubiquitous, it does so under frameworks that are inclusive, transparent, and benefit society universally – much like the ideals of the AI commons but focused on robotics hardware and software. In practical terms, advocates of a “Universal Robot Consortium” aim to unite manufacturers, researchers, and end-users (including workers) to cooperatively develop key robotic technologies (from open-source robotic operating systems to safety protocols), rather than competing in silos. This would help avoid fragmentation and power concentration in the robotics industry, making advanced robotic solutions accessible even to smaller companies and communities. URCA’s ethos, as envisioned by founder Hisham Khasawinah, can be summarized as striving for “Robotics by the people, for the people,” ensuring that even as robots spread, no single entity monopolizes their capabilities or data.
• Concept and Structure: URCA is a global consortium – an alliance and non-profit cooperative – where members jointly fund and govern initiatives for open robotics. In the future, URCA may maintain open-source projects (for example, global libraries of robotic hardware designs or code) under democratic oversight. We see precursors in things like the ROS (Robot Operating System) community, which has thousands of contributors worldwide and is moving toward a more community-driven governance via the Open Source Robotics Foundation. In fact, in 2024 the OSRF launched the Open Source Robotics Alliance (OSRA) to expand community participation in major robotics software projects. This alliance uses a mixed governance model with technical committees and paid memberships for companies, somewhat akin to a cooperative of industry, academia, and users working together on shared robotics infrastructure. URCA advocates may build on such models to possibly create a universal consortium: imagine major robotics labs, manufacturers, and user groups (like robotics cooperatives of workers) all having representation. The structure would emphasize knowledge-sharing (publishing research openly), setting common standards for interoperability, and perhaps pooling patents into a commons so that innovation isn’t stifled by proprietary barriers. It might also push initiatives like a “Universal Robot License” (inspired by Creative Commons) to encourage sharing designs with certain use stipulations. Overall, the structure envisioned is one of multi-stakeholder cooperation in robotics development – breaking down the traditional competitive approach in favor of collaborative innovation.
• Impact: Although URCA in name is aspirational, the impact of its underlying philosophy is increasingly evident in the robotics realm. Collaborative robotics consortia have started to form, recognizing that no single entity can solve all technical challenges. For instance, the ROS-Industrial Consortium brings together robotics firms and research institutions to extend open-source ROS for industrial applications – treating core development as a collaborative effort. We also see industry players co-funding testbeds and data sharing in arenas like autonomous driving and drone navigation, acknowledging the need for a common, safe backbone. URCAs (Universal Robot Consortium Advocates) highlight these trends as steps toward a more formal cooperative consortium. When URCA comes to fruition, its impact will be profound: it will lower the cost of entry for robotics (as shared designs and software reduce duplication), increase safety and ethics (through collectively agreed standards and review), and ensure that even developing countries or small businesses can access cutting-edge robotics tech. Workers would benefit too – a consortium might, for example, involve labor unions in discussions about how robots can augment rather than replace jobs, and in training programs that the consortium supports. In a broader sense, URCA’s impact is about shaping the narrative that robots are a shared resource. By advocating cooperation, it counters the notion of a robotic arms race and instead encourages pooling intellect for the greater good. This aligns with the cooperative movement’s push to add solidarity into the tech development equation – a principle often missing in profit-driven innovation. In the coming years, we may see URCA materialize as an alliance that, much like AI Commons for software, ensures robotics knowledge and benefits spread universally rather than concentrating in a few tech hubs or corporations.

---

Conclusion

From driver-owned data platforms and citizen data cooperatives to global alliances for open AI, these examples of AI and robotics cooperatives demonstrate a shared belief: technology’s future should be shaped with the people, not just handed down by profit-driven firms. Each cooperative highlighted – Driver’s Seat giving gig workers a voice, Salus Coop handing patients the reins to their data, Data Union Foundation enabling collective data ownership, AI Commons rallying global collaboration, READ-COOP preserving heritage with community AI, and more – is an experiment in “doing tech differently.” They prioritize democratic governance, equity, and mutual benefit, showing that advanced technology can align with human empowerment and social values.

These cooperatives and collectives are still small beside tech giants, but their impact is growing. They have proven viable models: increasing incomes for members, unlocking new datasets for innovation, and influencing policies on data rights and AI ethics. Importantly, they fill a gap in the AI/robotics landscape by infusing it with the principle of solidarity. In traditional AI development, concerns like fairness and transparency are now discussed, but cooperatives add a new dimension – shared ownership and inclusive governance – which can lead to more accountable and community-centered technology. As scholars have noted, co-ops won’t outspend Big Tech, but they offer a path for AI and robotics that is aligned with public interest and long-term societal well-being.

In conclusion, AI and robotics cooperatives are planting the seeds of a more equitable tech ecosystem. They suggest that we don’t have to accept a future of AI dominated by a few corporations; instead, we can collectively build and steward AI/robotics as a commons. Their missions, structures, and impacts, as detailed above, show the power of cooperation in turning technology into a force for shared prosperity. As these initiatives continue to grow and new ones (like potential cooperative consortiums in robotics) emerge, they will play a vital role in ensuring that the benefits of AI and automation are universal, not just for the few. The cooperative model – with its emphasis on democracy, participation, and community – may well be a key to unlocking a more just and human-centered AI future.

---

References

1. Driver’s Seat Cooperative. “Co-op Helps Uber, Lyft Drivers Use Data to Maximize Earnings.” TechCrunch, 6 Feb. 2020.
2. Witt, Hays. “Driver’s Seat Puts Data — and Power — in Gig Workers’ Hands.” The Rockefeller Foundation, 2019.
3. Cato Institute. “Friday Feature: Radiant Collective.” Cato Institute Blog, 3 May 2024.
4. Salus Coop. “Salus Coop – Data Cooperatives Case Study.” The GovLab, NYU.
5. Harvard Business Review. “5 Ways Cooperatives Can Shape the Future of AI.” Harvard Business Review, 28 June 2025.
6. DataUnion Foundation. “DataUnion Foundation – Together, We Can Do More!” DataUnion, 2022.
7. AI Commons. “Initiatives – AI Commons.” AI Commons, 2021.
8. Schafer, Kevin et al. “TPOCo: A Universal Energy-Based Framework for Understanding Cooperation Across Scales.” OSF Preprints, 11 Apr. 2025.
9. Open Robotics. “Announcing the Open Source Robotics Alliance (OSRA).” Open Robotics Blog, 18 Mar. 2024.
10. Platform Cooperativism Consortium. “Cooperatives at the Intersection of Fair Algorithmic Design, Data Sovereignty, and Worker Rights.” Platform.coop, 1 Apr. 2024.